Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 9/19/2006

Information Sciences Corp. v. United States

Citations

  • 73 Fed. Cl. 70
  • 2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 274
  • 2006 WL 2686753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the FAR “requires evidence of the [SSA’s] exercise of independent judgment”
  • “The question of prejudice turns, in part, on the relationship between the protestor(s) and the specific procurement process that is being challenged.”
  • “By providing a cogent explanation as to why Symplicity’s price was lower than the other offerors, the court is satisfied that GSA Price Team performed a ‘price realism analysis’ in accordance with the Solicitation.”
  • using a “substantial chance” test
  • using a “substantial chance” test
  • using a “substantial chance” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Braden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Information Sciences Corp. v. United States

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.