Federal Claims· 9/26/2007

Ironclad/EEI v. United States

Citations

78 Fed. Cl. 351
2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 313
2007 WL 2823678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that “plaintiff has waived [four] counts of the complaint” when it failed to address them in its MJAR
noting that “under the law of this circuit, arguments not presented in a party’s principal brief to the court are typically deemed to have been waived”
noting that “under the law of this circuit, arguments not presented in a party’s principal brief to the court are typically deemed to have been waived”
noting that “under the law of this circuit, arguments not presented in a party’s principal brief to the court are typically deemed to have been waived”
noting that “under the law of this circuit, arguments not presented in a party’s principal brief to the court are typically deemed to have been waived”
noting that “under the law of this circuit, arguments not presented in a party’s principal brief to the court are typically deemed to have been waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bush

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.