Rex Service Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that to demonstrate “the requisite direct economic interest” a plaintiff “is required to establish that it had a ‘substantial chance’ of receiving the contract”
• holding that, to have standing, a protestor must demonstrate it had a “substantial chance” of receiving the contract award
• holding that plaintiff-protestor alleging violations in solicitation process did not have “substantial chance” of receiving contract because plaintiff never bid on contract prior to close of solicitation
• stating that, “to prove a direct economic interest ..., [a protestor] is required to establish that it had a ‘substantial chance’ of receiving the contract”
• requiring that a party be an actual or potential offeror and have a direct economic interest in the outcome of the procurement to have standing
• requiring that a putative, prospective bidder establish that it had a “substantial chance” of receiving the contract as proof of possessing a direct economic interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).