Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when examining decisions made under conditions of scientific uncertainty \a reviewing court must generally be at its most deferential\
• recognizing that a reviewing court should be at its most deferential in reviewing an agency’s scientific conclusions in an area within the agency’s expertise
• holding that a reviewing court must be \at its most deferential” when the agency is \making predictions, within its area of special expertise, at the frontiers of science”
• holding that, “at the frontiers of science, ... a reviewing court must generally be at its most deferential”
• holding that “[w]hen examining ... [a] scientific determination ... a reviewing court must generally be at its most deferential”
• holding that “[w]hen examining ... [a] scientific determination ... a reviewing court must generally be at its most deferential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).