In Re US

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the govern- ment had standing to challenge decision on confidentiality of taxpayer information because the “tax system hinges on the willingness of taxpayers to provide such infor- mation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bailey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
• Russello v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
• Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
• United States v. Menasche
  Supreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
• Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court· 2009-12-08· cited 931×
• Montclair v. Ramsdell
  Supreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 485×
• Bates v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1997-11-04· cited 321×
• Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh
  Supreme Court· 2004-11-30· cited 243×
• Church of Scientology v. Internal Revenue Service
  Supreme Court· 1987-11-10· cited 202×
• Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.
  Supreme Court· 1936-03-02· cited 164×
• In Re Seagate Technology, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2007-08-20· cited 147×
• In Re the Regents of the University of California
  Federal Circuit· 1996-11-14· cited 119×
• Vons Companies, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2001-11-06· cited 61×
• Shell Petroleum, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2000-09-21· cited 22×
• In re United States
  Federal Circuit· 2012-01-20· cited 12×
• Panasonic Communications Corp. of America v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2011-04-20· cited 2×