Third Circuit· 8/24/2011
In Re Taylor
Citations
- 655 F.3d 274
- 2011 WL 3692440
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court need not make a finding of bad faith and that the relevant inquiry is whether the conduct was objectively unreasonable
- explaining that “[i]f the reasonably foreseeable effect of [the] representations to the bankruptcy court was to mislead the court, they cannot be said to have complied with Rule 9011”
- discussing Rule 11 in context of a motion under Rule 9011
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuentes, Smith, Van Antwerpen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Maureen Mirabella v. Susan VillardThird Circuit· 2017-04-04· cited 118×
- Ettinger & Associates, LLC v. Miller (In Re Miller)Third Circuit· 2013-09-16· cited 32×
- Culhane v. Aurora Loan ServicesD. Massachusetts· 2011-11-28· cited 24×
- Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management Systems, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-12-06· cited 15×
- Robert Wharton v. Superintendent Graterford SCIThird Circuit· 2024-03-08· cited 15×
- In re T.H.E.D. Virginia· 2015-03-18· cited 14×
- In re Jefferson CountyN.D. Alabama· 2012-01-19· cited 13×
- Theokary v. AbbatielloE.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-04-10· cited 12×
- In re Coquico, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-04-02· cited 6×
- In re DobbsN.D. Mississippi· 2015-08-20· cited 6×
- Paige v. Lerner Master Fund, LLCM.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-01-12· cited 4×
- Ettinger & Associates LLC v. Miller (In re Miller)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-02-25· cited 4×
- Baker v. HarringtonFirst Circuit· 2016-06-29· cited 3×
- In re Visteon Corp.Third Circuit· 2014-08-28· cited 3×
- A PDX Pro Co. v. Dish Network Service, LLCD. Colorado· 2015-11-30· cited 3×
- Agnew v. E TRADE SECURITIES LLCE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-09-09· cited 2×
- In Re Jefferson County, Ala.N.D. Alabama· 2012-01-06· cited 2×
- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Berns v. Labaton Sucharow LLPFirst Circuit· 2022-02-09
- Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Associates II, P.C.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-09-29
- Copeland v. Tom's Foods, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2012-01-20
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 2,206×
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 811×
- United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo, United States of America v. Leonard A. PelulloThird Circuit· 2005-02-25· cited 480×
- Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. HoodSupreme Court· 2004-05-17· cited 300×
- Mary Ann Pensiero, Inc. v. LingleThird Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 220×
- Fellheimer, Eichen & Braverman, P.C. v. Charter Technologies, IncorporatedThird Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 216×
- Martens v. ThomannSecond Circuit· 2001-11-20· cited 173×
- No. 93-5080Third Circuit· 1994-06-21· cited 112×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1997-02-11· cited 99×
- Williamson v. Recovery Ltd. PartnershipSecond Circuit· 2008-08-22· cited 92×
- In Re Joseph Gioioso Carol Jean Gioioso, Debtors. Chester J. Stuebben Westfield Home News Service, Inc. v. Joseph Gioioso Carol Jean GioiosoThird Circuit· 1992-11-16· cited 58×
- Garr v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.Third Circuit· 1994-06-29· cited 56×
- United States v. Tabor Court Realty Corp.Third Circuit· 1991-09-05· cited 30×
- Richard A. Waltz v. County of Lycoming, Raymond A. Holland, and Peter J. Purcaro, Richard A. Waltz, Allen E. Ertel, AttorneyThird Circuit· 1992-09-29· cited 16×
- In Re Cendant Corp. Derivative Action LitigationD. New Jersey· 2000-05-12· cited 15×
- In Re WaringN.D. Ohio· 2009-02-27· cited 3×
- In Re GrecoS.D. Florida· 2009-05-11· cited 1×
- Barkley v. Prommis Solutions Holding Corp. (In Re Thorne)N.D. Mississippi· 2011-06-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.