United States v. Leonard A. Pelullo, United States of America v. Leonard A. Pelullo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence collected by civil investigators could not be imputed to the prosecution because the civil investigators played no role in the criminal case
• holding that no “cause” exists under Banks if the prosecution is unaware of the evidence
• holding that evidence collected by civil investigators could not be imputed to the prosecution because the civil investigators played no role in the criminal case
• holding that evidence collected by civil investigators could not be imputed to the prosecution because the civil investigators played no role in the criminal case
• holding appellant ordinarily may not raise issue for the first time in a reply brief, absent exceptional circumstances
• stating that “[i]t is well settled that an appellant’s failure to identify or argue an issue in his opening brief constitutes waiver of that issue on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).