Supreme Court· 6/23/2011

Stern v. Marshall

Citations

131 S. Ct. 2594
180 L. Ed. 2d 475
564 U.S. 462
2011 U.S. LEXIS 4791

Oral argument

Argued
61 min recording
Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that all core proceedings necessarily arise under title 11 or arise in a title 11 case
holding that a bankruptcy judge’s authority is likewise limited for claims that are statutorily core but constitutionally non-core
holding that a bankruptcy judge’s authority is likewise limited for claims that are statutorily core but constitutionally non-core
holding that 28 U.S.C. § 157 (b)(5) is not jurisdictional and can be forfeited or waived
holding that “[w]e conclude today that Congress, in one isolated respect, exceeded [Article Ill’s] limitation in the Bankruptcy Act of 1984”
holding that the relevant claim was under state common law between two private parties, so that Congress had “nothing to do with it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Scalia, Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,263 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Stern v. Marshall

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.