In re Visteon Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that defendant was “not entitled to fees for legal services expended on its unsuccessful motion to dismiss”
• “In this circuit, it is well settled that ‘allowable costs are specifically set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1920,’ and that ‘expert witness fees are not recoverable under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 or Rule 54.’” (citations omitted) (first quoting Papas v. Hanlon, 849 F.2d 702, 704 (1st Cir. 1988

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).