No. 93-5080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a court may impose sanctions where “the filing of the complaint constituted abusive litigation or misuse of the court's process”
• stating that a court may impose sanctions where “the filing of the complaint constituted abusive litigation or misuse of the court’s process”
• noting that in some cases, “the opportunity for counsel to fully brief the issue will suffice,” but explaining that “[a]t bottom, however, there must be ... some opportunity to respond”
• reaching the analogous conclusion that a District Court wishing to impose Rule 11 sanctions sua sponte must do so prior to or contemporaneously with its entry of final judgment
• reaching the analogous conclusion that a District Court wishing to impose Rule 11 sanctions sua sponte must do so prior to or contemporaneously with its entry of final judgment
• factual determinations, legal conclusions, and choice of sanction under Rule 11 receive \substantial deference\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).