District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/17/2015

IN RE S.W.

Citations

124 A.3d 89
2015 D.C. App. LEXIS 451
2015 WL 5474170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

excluding the suspect’s incriminating statements as involuntary despite finding that the detective provided proper Miranda warnings and the suspect never asserted the privilege
excluding the suspect’s incriminating statements as involuntary despite finding that the detective provided proper Miranda warnings and the suspect never asserted the privilege
reversing trial court where, under the “totality of the circumstances,” police’s coercive statements and suspect’s juvenile status rendered Miranda waiver involuntary
excluding the suspect’s incriminating statements as involuntary despite finding that the detective provided proper Miranda warnings and the suspect never asserted the privilege
“We reinforce the necessity of looking holistically at every custodial interrogation in reaching a conclusion specific to the facts presented.”
“We reinforce the necessity of looking holistically at every custodial interrogation in reaching a conclusion specific to the facts presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburne-Rigsby, Easterly, Epstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.