Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 4/24/2001

In Re: Sealed Case

Citations

  • 246 F.3d 696
  • 345 U.S. App. D.C. 352
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7385
  • 2001 WL 409116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hearsay of sufficient reliability may be used at sentencing
  • deeming the evidence reliable under de novo review without deciding the applicable standard
  • deeming the evidence reliable under de novo review without deciding the applicable standard
  • Apprendi does not apply to an “enhancement that results in a sentence within the statutory range.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.