United States v. Pedro Agramonte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Ray “spelled the death knell for the concurrent sentence doctrine as applied to review of convictions”
• finding that Mr. Agramonte is not entitled to any relief under Apprendi
• “We are affirming [the defendant’s] concurrent sentence of . . . eight years of supervised release on Count Four. He therefore cannot benefit from a shorter term of . . . supervised release on the other two counts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).