United States v. Graham, Steven A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• substantial rights affected where district court sentenced defendant under wrong subsec- tion of § 841, leading to higher minimum term of super- vised release
• remanding when district court “may have applied” incorrect mandatory minimum
• “With respect to the contrary testimony regarding the availability of cocaine base in the District during the summer of 1999, the district court referred [to] Andrews’ testimony in making its ruling, implicitly indicating that it was crediting Andrews’ testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).