United States v. Webb, Dennis L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an Apprendi error was not plain where the defendant offered no “scenario under which he could plausibly have disputed the drug quantities specified by the chemist”
• holding that where the lawful application of the Sentencing Guidelines would result in the same sentence received as a result of an Ap-prendi error, the defendant’s substantial rights are unaffected
• holding that good-faith exception applied and suppression was not appropriate despite the fact that “the question remain[ed]” whether the warrant was supported by probable cause
• noting that the warrant in Schoeneman had issued on the basis “solely of an informant’s statement that he had seen classified documents in the defendant’s home on [a] single occasion”
• noting that the warrant in Schoeneman had issued on the basis “solely of an informant’s statement that he had seen classified documents in the defendant’s home on [a] single occasion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).