In Re Schering Plough Corp. Intron/Temodar Consumer Class Action

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “pure conjecture” was required to conclude that the defendants’ conduct ultimately caused the plaintiff injury, and therefore no standing existed
• noting that NJRICO and its federal counterpart “parallel each other” and “are intended to be coextensive”
• holding. that plaintiffs must establish standing for each claim or cause of action
• finding that the pleading failed to allege sufficient facts regarding an alleged participant in a wrongful scheme because the pleading did not explain the basis for the allegations based on information and belief about the participant
• applying plausibility requirement to evaluate whether complaint adequately pleads elements of jurisdictional requirement of standing
• analyzing state and federal RICO claims concurrently “because the two RICO statutes are intended to be coextensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).