· 7/31/2000
Federal Case
Citations
- 220 F.3d 169
- 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20001
- 51 ERC (BNA) 1014
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18287
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the phrase “law of the place” in the sixth prong of § 1346(b)(1) is jurisdictional
- explaining that failure to identify the governing standard suggests that the district court may not have applied that standard
- explaining that “when the merits and jurisdiction are closely related, a court may determine subject matter jurisdiction without reaching the merits....”
- finding the merits of the case and jurisdiction under the FTCA to be intertwined
- plenary review over a grant of a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
- “when the merits and jurisdiction are closely related, a court may determine subject matter jurisdiction without reaching the merits.... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.