Skip to main content
· 7/31/2000

Federal Case

Citations

  • 220 F.3d 169
  • 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20001
  • 51 ERC (BNA) 1014
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the phrase “law of the place” in the sixth prong of § 1346(b)(1) is jurisdictional
  • explaining that failure to identify the governing standard suggests that the district court may not have applied that standard
  • explaining that “when the merits and jurisdiction are closely related, a court may determine subject matter jurisdiction without reaching the merits....”
  • finding the merits of the case and jurisdiction under the FTCA to be intertwined
  • plenary review over a grant of a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
  • “when the merits and jurisdiction are closely related, a court may determine subject matter jurisdiction without reaching the merits.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.