Cathleen Silha v. ACT, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the Twombly–Iqbal facial plausibility requirement for pleading a claim” under Rule 12(b)(6) “is incorporated into the standard for pleading subject matter jurisdiction” under Rule 12(b)(1)
• holding that the Twombly- Iqbal standard applies to a facial challenge to subject-matter jurisdiction
• noting that a court “may look beyond the pleadings and view any evidence submitted” when reviewing a factual challenge
• instructing that “when evaluating a facial challenge to subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), a court should use Twombly-Iqbal's ‘plausibility’ requirement.”
• noting that in evaluating a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, a court must first determine whether a defendant has raised a factual or facial challenge
• noting that in evaluating a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, a court must first determine whether a defendant has raised a factual or facial challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).