Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion “in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule”
• holding that a court reviewing a complaint on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion need not accept a “legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation.”
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion “in denying a motion for a class action determination which was untimely under the local rule”
• holding that surviving a motion to dismiss requires a plaintiff to set forth enough factual allegations to show that the plaintiff has a “plausible claim for relief”
• holding that plaintiff satisfied this pleading burden when she alleged an impairment, that defendant knew of impairment, and the impairment limited her ability to perform sedentary work
• holding that is the rule even after the Twombly and Iqbal plausibility standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).