In re S.C.

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 233

Syllabus

Based on the evidence admitted at the hearing, the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion assigning income to father and setting the support obligation. In deciding to assign income as it did, the trial court did not err in discounting the opinion of mother's expert because the opinion was speculative in nature. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to modify the support obligation to a date earlier than mother's modification motion because mother could not prove that special circumstances dictated otherwise. The juvenile court's decision on how to split the amount of extraordinary medical expenses between the parties and set the amount father must pay for his arrears was not unreasonable. Therefore, the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion on these matters.