Marron v. Marron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in including husband’s interest in a family owned corporation as income in support calculations because it increases the party’s wealth and the party could exercise control over the investment if he so chose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).