Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 7/26/1989

Booth v. Booth

Citations

  • 44 Ohio St. 3d 142
  • 541 N.E.2d 1028
  • 1989 Ohio LEXIS 159
  • 1989 WL 82225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allocation of parental rights and responsibilities is appropriately viewed under an abuse of discretion standard
  • “ordering the sale of the marital residence” is governed by the abuse of discretion standard
  • abuse of discretion standard applies to child support, custody, visitation, spousal support, and division of marital property
  • abuse of discretion standard applies to child support, custody, visitation, spousal support, and division of marital property
  • \The standard of review in domestic relations cases is whether the trial court abused its discretion.\
  • abuse of discretion standard applies to child support, custody, visitation, spousal support, and division of marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Only, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

423 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Booth v. Booth

39 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.