Harmon v. Harmon

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 8682

Syllabus

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in naming Father the residential parent where the court considered all relevant factors in accordance with R.C. 3109.04(F)(1) and determined it was in the children's best interest for Father to be named custodial parent. Trial court did abuse its discretion, however, in calculating child support and awarding Father tax dependency exemptions where the court relied on an erroneous finding that the parties had \equal\ parenting time. Under the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities, the children were in the nonresidential parent's custody more than 65 percent of the year.