In re J.D.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 996
Syllabus
R.C. 3119.83 provides that, except as provided in R.C. 3119.84, a court may not retroactively modify an obligor's duty to pay a delinquent support payment. R.C. 3119.84 permits retroactive modification of child support only for the period between filing a motion for modification and a final order on the motion. Termination of an arrearage is a retroactive modification of child support. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying Father's motion. Additionally, the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in finding Father had not demonstrated a change of circumstances and that modification of custody was not in the children's best interests.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 987×
- In re MullenOhio Supreme Court· 2011-07-12· cited 70×
- Lykins v. LykinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-04· cited 4×
- Atkins v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-28· cited 3×
- D.M v. J.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-05· cited 3×
- In re S.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-27· cited 3×
- Oyedare v. OyedareOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.