· 5/8/1995
In Re Rufener Construction, Inc.
Citations
- 53 F.3d 1064
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 5842
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3374
- 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2268
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10171
- 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that § 1113 is inapplicable to case converted from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7
- The Ninth 18 Circuit “derive[s] meaning from context, and this requires reading the relevant statutory 19 provisions as a whole.”
- The Ninth 23 Circuit “derive[s] meaning from context, and this requires reading the relevant statutory 24 provisions as a whole.”
- The Ninth 1 Circuit “derive[s] meaning from context, and this requires reading the relevant statutory 2 provisions as a whole.”
- “We derive meaning from context, and this requires reading the relevant statutory provisions as a whole.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.