· 3/22/1988
In Re Unimet Corporation, Debtor. United Steelworkers of America v. Unimet Corporation
Citations
- 842 F.2d 879
- 9 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1689
- 18 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 694
- 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3139
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6286
- 17 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 726
- 1988 WL 23309
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting employer’s reliance on another section of Code “to escape its obligations” under labor agreement in view of section 1113’s “unequivocal” prohibitions of unilateral modification
- \section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement\
- “section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Milburn, Guy, Contie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.