Skip to main content
· 3/22/1988

In Re Unimet Corporation, Debtor. United Steelworkers of America v. Unimet Corporation

Citations

  • 842 F.2d 879
  • 9 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1689
  • 18 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 694
  • 127 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3139
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6286
  • 17 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 726
  • 1988 WL 23309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting employer’s reliance on another section of Code “to escape its obligations” under labor agreement in view of section 1113’s “unequivocal” prohibitions of unilateral modification
  • \section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement\
  • “section 1113 unequivocally prohibits the employer from unilaterally modifying any provision of the collective bargaining agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Milburn, Guy, Contie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.