In Re Echeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that courts cannot read words or even sub-sections of a statute in isolation; instead, statutory construction is a holistic endeavor requiring all relevant statutory provisions be read together
• debtor is not entitled to pay priority unsecured claims from projected disposable income if such claims have already been deducted on Form B22C
• “In essence, the effective re- sult is the same for all debtors—priority unsecured claims can be counted once, no more, no less, in determining which funds are left for nonpriority unsecured creditors.”
• “In essence, the effective re- sult is the same for all debtors—priority unsecured claims can be counted once, no more, no less, in determining which funds are left for nonpriority unsecured creditors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).