In Re Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that technically attorney’s fees should be deducted as a priority claim pursuant to § 707(b)(2)(A)(iv) even though local practice allowed the pot deduction
• denying confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan that provided for projected disposable income to be paid to priority unsecured creditors, which the court held were not “unsecured creditors” within the meaning of § 1325(b)
• denying confirmation of a Chapter 13 plan that provided for projected disposable income to be paid to priority unsecured creditors, which the court held were not “unsecured creditors” within the meaning of § 1325(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baud v. Carroll
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-02-04· cited 69×
• In re Wise
  District of Columbia· 2012-08-16· cited 2×
• Richard Baud v. Krispen S. Carroll
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-02-04

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 1,871×
• Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)
  Eighth Circuit· 2008-10-27· cited 97×
• In Re Rufener Construction, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-05-08· cited 42×
• In Re Williams
  D. Colorado· 2008-09-12· cited 40×
• In Re Wilbur
  D. Utah· 2006-06-21· cited 18×
• In Re Davis
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-07-22· cited 16×
• In Re Amato
  D. New Jersey· 2007-03-20· cited 11×
• In Re Rush
  W.D. Missouri· 2008-04-24· cited 11×
• In Re Echeman
  S.D. Ohio· 2007-11-07· cited 11×