Skip to main content
· 11/5/2009

Mollasgo v. Tills (In Re Tills)

Citations

  • 419 B.R. 444
  • 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3598
  • 2009 WL 3757002

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the Court would consider extrinsic evidence only to interpret existing terms that are ‘ambiguous.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laura S. Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.