· 11/5/2009
Mollasgo v. Tills (In Re Tills)
Citations
- 419 B.R. 444
- 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3598
- 2009 WL 3757002
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the Court would consider extrinsic evidence only to interpret existing terms that are ‘ambiguous.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Laura S. Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.