N.D. Georgia· 6/2/1994
In Re Rivers
Citations
- 167 B.R. 288
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because a debtor in possession is empowered to perform the duties of a trustee, a debtor in possession is a fiduciary.”
- \It is elementary that a professional may not solicit or accept compensation from a fiduciary without prior court approval and that compensation may be awarded only after notice to parties in interest and a hearing.\
- “It is elementary that a professional may not solicit or accept compensation from a fiduciary without prior court approval and that compensation may be awarded only after notice to parties in interest and a hearing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James E. Massey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Frank Pio Crivello, Debtor. Kravit, Gass & Weber, S.C. v. M. Scott Michel, United States TrusteeSeventh Circuit· 1998-01-09· cited 99×
- Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. Sherwood Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-07-29· cited 78×
- In Re JLM, Inc.Second Circuit· 1997-06-24· cited 42×
- Hansen, Jones & Leta, P.C. v. SegalD. Utah· 1998-02-18· cited 18×
- In Re Delta Petroleum (P.R.), Ltd.D. Puerto Rico· 1996-01-31· cited 17×
- McCrary & Dunlap Construction Co. v. Mendes & Gonzales PLLCSixth Circuit· 2003-10-27· cited 16×
- In re GrassoE.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-06-15· cited 10×
- Burtch v. Ganz (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-05-03· cited 8×
- In Re Count Liberty, LLCC.D. California· 2007-05-04· cited 8×
- In re Dreamplay, Inc.D. Maryland· 2015-07-27· cited 8×
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against FullerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-01-25· cited 7×
- Vergos v. Mendes & Gonzales, PLLC (In Re McCrary & Dunlap Construction Co.)M.D. Tennessee· 2001-01-10· cited 4×
- Maxfield v. Quarles & Brady LLP (In Re Jennings)M.D. Florida· 2007-10-26· cited 2×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryEleventh Circuit· 1988-02-01· cited 1,349×
- In Re RobertsD. Utah· 1985-02-04· cited 200×
- In Re RobertsD. Utah· 1987-06-08· cited 138×
- In Re Envirodyne Industries, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1993-03-03· cited 43×
- In Re LeeC.D. California· 1989-02-08· cited 43×
- Kribbs v. JACKSONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-01-07· cited 35×
- In Re Consupak, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1988-06-03· cited 27×
- In Re WatsonS.D. Ohio· 1988-12-12· cited 20×
- Meara v. HewittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-24· cited 20×
- In Re Doors and More Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1991-04-05· cited 17×
- In Re James Contracting Group, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 1990-10-12· cited 15×
- Tigue v. Steger (In Re Tigue)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-02-16· cited 15×
- In Re Whitney Place PartnersN.D. Georgia· 1992-11-20· cited 12×
- Cowgill v. Acker (In Re Byman Furniture & Interiors, Inc.)S.D. Texas· 1981-09-29· cited 12×
- In Re DN AssociatesD. Maine· 1992-08-20· cited 9×
- Matter of 437 Park Corp.S.D. New York· 1985-10-10· cited 5×
- Babylon Cove Marine, Inc. v. Hanse (In Re Babylon Cove Marine, Inc.)E.D. New York· 1986-09-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.