Skip to main content
C.D. California· 2/8/1989

In Re Lee

Citations

  • 94 B.R. 172
  • 1988 WL 130076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, absent appropriate consent, a law firm may not represent both a corporation and its sole shareholder in related chapter 11 cases
  • stating that the same counsel may not represent two bankruptcy estates where there exists pre-petition transfers of assets from one debtor to the other in a transaction that is not at arms length
  • “[t]he unsanctioned representation of conflicting interests is one of the most serious sins that a lawyer can commit”
  • counsel could not represent both the corporation and its principal shareholder in each respective bankruptcy case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Samuel L. Bufford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.