McCrary & Dunlap Construction Co. v. Mendes & Gonzales PLLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the Commissioner’s “post hoc rationalization” of the ALJ’s RFC analysis because “‘what matters are the reasons articulated by the ALJ,’ not the rationale advanced by the government on appeal” (quoting Jelinek v. Astrue, 662 F.3d 805, 812 (7th Cir. 2011

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).