Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 12/12/1988

In Re Watson

Citations

  • 94 B.R. 111
  • 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 2112
  • 1988 WL 134026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \A disinterested person should be divested of any scintilla of personal interest which might be reflected in [that person's] decisions concerning estate matters.\
  • “A disinterested person should be divested of any scintilla of personal interest which might be reflected in [that person’s] decisions concerning estate matters.”
  • “Trustees do not [] have unfettered discretion in their choice of counsel' — the Code expressly subjects the selection to court approval.”
  • “A disinterested relationship to . . . the debtor . . . or for any other reason.”
  • disinterested person should be divested of any scintilla of personal interest ...

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.