Skip to main content
D. Utah· 6/8/1987

In Re Roberts

Citations

  • 75 B.R. 402
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a debtor has an important interest in hiring counsel of its choice
  • disallowing employment of law firm that was a prepetition creditor, represented a creditor, and failed to disclose its relationships with the debtors
  • since interdebtor claims were neither disputed nor priority claims, simultaneous representation of the debtor was not a conflict per se
  • “[T]here is no requirement for court approval of a Chapter 7 debtor’s employment of an attorney.”
  • in denying attorneys’ fees court lists thirty-four instances where an impermissible conflict of interest was found
  • since interdebtor claims were neither disputed nor priority claims, simultaneous representation of the debtor was not a conflict per se

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jenkins, Winder, Greene, Sam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.