D. Connecticut· 2/17/1994
In Re Peterson
Citations
- 163 B.R. 665
- 1994 WL 46501
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the distinction between the right to practice in a court and the right to practice law generally
- attorney admitted in federal court in Connecticut could not maintain his sole office in that state and hold himself out to residents- of Connecticut as a practitioner in bankruptcy law
- attorney admitted in federal court in Connecticut could not maintain his sole office in that state and hold himself out to residents of Connecticut as a practitioner in bankruptcy law
- “The flaw in that argument is that it fails to recognize the distinction between the right to practice in a court and the right to practice law generally.”
- right to practice law does not derive from federal court rules
- attorney admitted in federal district court in Connecticut but not admitted to practice in state of Connecticut could not maintain his sole office in Connecticut and hold himself out to residents of Connecticut as a practitioner in bankruptcy law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alan H.W. Shiff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re: William Engel, Debtor. Ferrara & Hantman Robert J. Hantman v. Jesus Antonio Alvarez Theodore J. Liscinski, Jr., Trustee United States TrusteeThird Circuit· 1997-09-03· cited 104×
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-16· cited 50×
- In Re Ernest J. Desilets, Debtor. Allan J. Rittenhouse v. Delta Home Improvement, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2002-06-03· cited 17×
- NovaCare Holdings, Inc. v. Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc. (In Re Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc.)D. Delaware· 2001-09-17· cited 17×
- In re ChimkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-07-22· cited 13×
- Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1996-04-10· cited 10×
- In Re DesiletsW.D. Michigan· 2000-04-17· cited 10×
- Rittenhouse v. Delta Home Improvement, Inc.W.D. Michigan· 2000-11-20· cited 6×
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceN.D. New York· 1995-12-11· cited 5×
- Chimko v. Lucas (In Re Lucas)D. Massachusetts· 2004-09-30· cited 4×
- Brown v. Smith (In Re Mendez)Ninth Circuit· 1999-03-03· cited 4×
- Abdallah v. PileggiD. New Jersey· 1996-02-14· cited 4×
- In Re Lite Ray Realty Corp.S.D. New York· 2001-01-16· cited 3×
- Brown v. Goode (In Re Brown)D. South Carolina· 2001-08-24· cited 1×
- In Re the Reinstatement of Mooreland-RuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2010-06-08· cited 1×
- In Re Reinstatement of Mooreland-RuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2010-06-08· cited 1×
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 5,239×
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 868×
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 420×
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 362×
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Second Circuit· 1956-06-06· cited 321×
- Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 196×
- Leslie Miller, Inc. v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1956-12-17· cited 112×
- Nick C. Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corporation, Theatre & Cinema, Inc., Philhamboro, Inc., Youngstown Theatre Corporation and Modern Playhouses, Inc.Second Circuit· 1966-08-02· cited 109×
- STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-04-15· cited 107×
- In The Matter Of Futuronics CorporationSecond Circuit· 1981-08-07· cited 106×
- In Re McDonald Bros. Construction, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1990-06-11· cited 100×
- In Re James W. LAND & Lois L. Land, Debtors. James W. LAND, Lois L. Land & Thomas J. Kerwin, Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALAMOSA, AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1991-09-10· cited 76×
- In the Matter Of: Grabill Corporation, Debtors-Appellees. Appeal Of: Daniel M. PelliccioniSeventh Circuit· 1993-01-05· cited 67×
- Grievance Committee v. DaceySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1966-07-19· cited 56×
- DeRonde v. Shirley (In Re Shirley)Ninth Circuit· 1992-01-08· cited 52×
- In Re Envirodyne Industries, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1993-03-03· cited 43×
- In Re BachmannS.D. Florida· 1990-03-30· cited 43×
- In the Matter of Wiredyne, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Tamalou Williams, TrusteeSeventh Circuit· 1993-08-30· cited 42×
- In Re Rusty Jones, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1991-12-09· cited 42×
- In Re NBI, Inc.D. Colorado· 1991-06-19· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.