Supreme Court· 6/19/1987

Frazier v. Heebe

Citations

482 U.S. 641
107 S. Ct. 2607
96 L. Ed. 2d 557
1987 U.S. LEXIS 2728
7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1139
55 U.S.L.W. 4877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “a district court has discretion to adopt local rules that are necessary to carry out the conduct of its business,” including “the regulation of admissions to its own bar”
noting that “in many District Courts, the decision on whether to grant pro hac vice status to an out-of-state attorney is purely discretionary”
noting that a district court’s “authority includes the regulation of admissions to its own bar”
noting that a district court’s “authority includes the regulation of admissions to its own bar”
noting that a district court’s “authority includes the regulation of admissions to its own bar”
noting that a district court’s “authority includes the regulation of admissions to its own bar”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

103 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Frazier v. Heebe

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.