Skip to main content
· 8/16/2004

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Marcone

Citations

  • 855 A.2d 654
  • 579 Pa. 1
  • 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prohibiting formerly admitted attorneys from engaging in any manner of law-related activities
  • addressing attorney’s arguments implicating Supremacy Clause, Commerce Clause, and First Amendment
  • “State law concerns are the foundation of federal diversity actions.... Thus, to suggest that because maintenance of an office is limited to federal practice, it does not constitute the practice of law within the borders of a state, is to ignore the realities of current legal practice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Lamb, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.