· 5/27/1963
Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida Bar
Citations
- 373 U.S. 379
- 83 S. Ct. 1322
- 10 L. Ed. 2d 428
- 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2486
- 137 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a state has a \substantial interest in regulating the practice of law within the State\
- holding that Florida could not exercise \a virtual power of review\ over PTO practice by prohibiting nonlawyers from engaging in patent practice
- recognizing that a state has a “substantial interest in regulating the practice of law within the State”
- holding that regulations authorizing nonlawyers to practice before the U.S. Patent Office preempted state unauthorized practice of law rules
- holding that Florida could not exercise “a virtual power of review” over PTO practice by prohibiting nonlawyers from engaging in patent practice
- holding that regulations authorizing nonlawyers to practice before the U.S. Patent Office preempted state unauthorized practice of law rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.