Skip to main content
· 5/27/1963

Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida Bar

Citations

  • 373 U.S. 379
  • 83 S. Ct. 1322
  • 10 L. Ed. 2d 428
  • 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2486
  • 137 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a state has a \substantial interest in regulating the practice of law within the State\
  • holding that Florida could not exercise \a virtual power of review\ over PTO practice by prohibiting nonlawyers from engaging in patent practice
  • recognizing that a state has a “substantial interest in regulating the practice of law within the State”
  • holding that regulations authorizing nonlawyers to practice before the U.S. Patent Office preempted state unauthorized practice of law rules
  • holding that Florida could not exercise “a virtual power of review” over PTO practice by prohibiting nonlawyers from engaging in patent practice
  • holding that regulations authorizing nonlawyers to practice before the U.S. Patent Office preempted state unauthorized practice of law rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.