In Re NBI, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[i]nclusion of the term `retainer' in Section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not by definition qualify all retainer arrangements as reasonable\ for the purposes of the \reasonable terms and conditions\ inquiry
• holding that “[ijnclusion of the term ‘retainer’ in Section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not by definition qualify all retainer arrangements as reasonable” for the purposes of the “reasonable terms and conditions” inquiry
• criticizing McDonald for failing to recognize the inherent difference between advance and classic retainers
• “Inclusion of the term ‘retainer’ in Section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not by definition qualify all retainer arrangements as reasonable. The Court, in its discretion, must make this determination.”
• “Inclusion of the term ‘retainer’ in Section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not by definition qualify all retainer arrangements as reasonable. The Court, in its discretion, must make this determination.”
• “Inclusion of the term ‘retainer’ in Section 328(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not by definition qualify all retainer arrangements as reasonable. The Court, in its discretion, must make this determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).