Skip to main content
S.D. Ohio· 1/11/2012

In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

Citations

  • 840 F. Supp. 2d 1044
  • 2012 WL 84548
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is thus not the individual non-core deviations themselves or in the aggregate that lead to this Court’s rejection of substantial compliance. Rather, what is significant is the overarching core concern implicated that makes the non-core deviations errors as opposed to approved departures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.