Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \all sexually oriented business license and permit applicants' names and current and past residential addresses constitute protected private information and are therefore exempted from Tennessee's Open Records Act\
• holding that courts “must, if possible, give effect to the Ordinance's severability clause so as not to invalidate the entire act.”
• holding that two years to challenge to a local ordinance prohibiting individuals with a sex-crime history to work for a sexually oriented business was too short in duration
• holding that “all sexually oriented business license and permit applicants’ names and current and past residential addresses constitute protected private information and are therefore exempted from Tennessee’s Open Records Act”
• finding that a group of plaintiffs could challenge an ordinance’s “judicial review provisions” even before seeking the permits that were the subject of the ordinance
• declining to find mootness despite change in city ordinance because the city “repeatedly expressed its intention to reenact those portions of the Ordinance judged unconstitutional by the district court at the earliest opportunity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).