Sixth Circuit· 6/2/1995
Moltan Co. v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
Citations
- 55 F.3d 1171
- 1995 WL 326573
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court did not have the authority to enter the permanent injunction prior to trial or an evidentiary hearing.
- explaining that whether to require a bond is within the discretion of the court
- upholding the lower court’s decision not to require bond “because of the strength of [the prevailing party’s] case and the strong public interest involved”
- “According to the lower court, no security was needed because of the strength of Eagle-Picher’s case and the strong public interest involved. . . . [W]e conclude that the District Court did not err . . . .”
- explaining procedure generally for resolution of overlapping equitable and legal issues
- finding no bond is required when strong public interest is involved
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cleland, Daughtrey, Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Henry Pashby v. Albert DeliaFourth Circuit· 2013-03-05· cited 399×
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoNinth Circuit· 1999-02-11· cited 149×
- Michael L. Schaefer v. Indiana Michigan Power Company, D/B/A American Electric PowerSixth Circuit· 2004-02-13· cited 58×
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationS.D. Ohio· 2012-01-11· cited 26×
- City of Chi. v. SessionsE.D. Illinois· 2018-07-27· cited 25×
- Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. Morgan Tire & Auto, Inc.S.D. Florida· 1996-02-01· cited 16×
- Neveux v. Webcraft Technologies, Inc.E.D. Michigan· 1996-03-21· cited 16×
- John Doe 1 v. William LeeSixth Circuit· 2024-05-15· cited 16×
- Preterm-Cleveland v. HimesS.D. Ohio· 2018-03-14· cited 11×
- Bookfriends, Inc. v. TaftS.D. Ohio· 2002-08-30· cited 8×
- Disability Rights Ohio v. Buckeye Ranch, Inc.S.D. Ohio· 2019-03-26· cited 8×
- Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Don Sundquist, Governor, of the State of TennesseeSixth Circuit· 1999-08-13· cited 7×
- Pita Delight, Inc. v. SalamiE.D. Michigan· 1998-11-03· cited 7×
- Jones v. PerryE.D. Kentucky· 2016-10-18· cited 7×
- La.-Pac. Corp. v. James Hardie Bldg. Prods., Inc.M.D. Tennessee· 2018-08-17· cited 5×
- Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. Wichita & Affiliated TribesTenth Circuit· 2017-12-18· cited 5×
- Plainfield Specialty Holdings II Inc. v. Children's Legal Services PLLCE.D. Michigan· 2009-04-28· cited 4×
- Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. YostS.D. Ohio· 2019-04-18· cited 4×
- Concerned Pastors for Social Action v. KhouriE.D. Michigan· 2016-12-02· cited 3×
- Ohio Republican Party v. BrunnerS.D. Ohio· 2008-10-09· cited 2×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthSixth Circuit· 1978-09-01· cited 201×
- Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonSixth Circuit· 1954-12-01· cited 114×
- Avon Group, Inc. v. New York Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court· 1991-10-07· cited 46×
- William MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUN OIL COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1980-12-22· cited 45×
- United States v. James H. McGeeSixth Circuit· 1983-07-26· cited 33×
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 32×
- Zbigniew W. Dybczak v. Tuskegee Institute, an Alabama CorporationEleventh Circuit· 1984-08-01· cited 31×
- Perez-Serrano v. DeLeon-VelezFirst Circuit· 1989-02-22· cited 22×
- City of South Sioux City v. Sioux City Foundry Co.Supreme Court· 1993-02-22· cited 20×
- International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, Local Union No. 1937, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Norfolk Southern CorporationSixth Circuit· 1991-04-24· cited 11×
- Branham v. SpurgisW.D. Michigan· 1989-08-04· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.