In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inmate sought a stay of execution on the basis that the lethal injection protocol would cause his execution to violate the Eighth Amendment because he possessed “physical and medical characteristics that increase his risk of obstructive sleep apnea”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
  S.D. Ohio· 2017-01-26· cited 85×
• Stephen Michael West v. Derrick D. Schofield
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-03-10· cited 53×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• University of Texas v. Camenisch
  Supreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 2,376×
• Lloyd D. Alkire v. Judge Jane Irving
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-06-02· cited 1,134×
• Baze v. Rees
  Supreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,040×
• Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis v. Resweber
  Supreme Court· 1947-02-10· cited 571×
• Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless & Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 v. Blackwell
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-10-31· cited 304×
• United States v. Edward Rose & Sons, Dorchen/martin Associates, Incorporated Eckert/wordell Architects, Pc Gerald Peterson James R. Saule
  Sixth Circuit· 2004-08-25· cited 161×
• Philip Workman v. Governor Phil Bredesen
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-05-07· cited 142×
• Cooey v. Strickland
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-12-07· cited 84×
• Cooey v. Kasich
  S.D. Ohio· 2011-07-08· cited 28×
• In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
  S.D. Ohio· 2012-01-11· cited 26×
• In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
  S.D. Ohio· 2012-04-04· cited 17×
• In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
  S.D. Ohio· 2012-11-05· cited 6×