Ninth Circuit· 2/28/2012
Robert Charles Towery v Janice K Brewer
Citations
- 672 F.3d 650
- 2012 WL 627787
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting \a distinction between state action that violates a fundamental right and state action that merely burdens a fundamental right.\
- class-of-one doctrine of equal protection does not apply to state action that involves discretionary decisionmaking based on subjective, individualized assessments
- “Under 9 the ‘serious questions’ version of the [preliminary injunction] test” a plaintiff must still show that 10 “there is a likelihood of irreparable injury.”
- “Under 3 || the ‘serious questions’ version of the [preliminary injunction] test” a plaintiff must still show that 4 || “there is a likelihood of irreparable injury.”
- “The 7 class-of-one doctrine does not apply to forms of state action that by their nature involve 8 discretionary decision-making based on a vast array of subjective, individualized 9 assessments.”
- for class of one theory, individual must establish less favorable treatment than others generally
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKeown, Berzon, Rawlinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Samuel Lopez v. Janice BrewerNinth Circuit· 2012-05-15· cited 333×
- Del Marcelle v. Brown County Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2012-05-17· cited 143×
- Jessie Hoffman v. Bobby JindalFifth Circuit· 2013-08-30· cited 98×
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court· 2017-11-27· cited 46×
- Donahoe v. ArpaioD. Arizona· 2012-04-09· cited 29×
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2014-07-19· cited 24×
- First Amendment Coalition v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2019-09-17· cited 22×
- Gerald Pizzuto, Jr. v. Josh TewaltNinth Circuit· 2021-05-12· cited 19×
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationS.D. Ohio· 2012-04-04· cited 17×
- Thomas Creech v. Josh TewaltNinth Circuit· 2023-10-13· cited 16×
- Pizzuto v. TewaltNinth Circuit· 2025-03-21· cited 10×
- Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. HarrisS.D. California· 2016-10-31· cited 7×
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationS.D. Ohio· 2012-11-05· cited 6×
- Scocca v. SmithN.D. California· 2012-12-17· cited 6×
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-07-26· cited 5×
- Samuel Lopez v. Janice BrewerNinth Circuit· 2012-05-18· cited 3×
- First Amendment Coalition of Arizona, Inc. v. RyanD. Arizona· 2016-05-18· cited 1×
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanNinth Circuit· 2014-07-21
- Planned Parenthood of the Great Nw. & the Hawaiian Islands v. WasdenD. Idaho· 2018-10-22
- Pizzuto v. TewaltNinth Circuit· 2025-05-14
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court· 2000-02-23· cited 3,896×
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court· 1964-10-12· cited 3,703×
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellNinth Circuit· 2011-01-25· cited 2,463×
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1997-06-16· cited 2,432×
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,999×
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court· 2008-06-09· cited 1,599×
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,040×
- Hill v. McDonoughSupreme Court· 2006-06-12· cited 658×
- Bush v. GoreSupreme Court· 2000-12-12· cited 553×
- The Lands Council v. McNairNinth Circuit· 2008-07-02· cited 543×
- Cook v. BrewerNinth Circuit· 2011-03-16· cited 218×
- Dickens v. BrewerNinth Circuit· 2011-02-09· cited 39×
- In re Ohio Execution Protocol LitigationS.D. Ohio· 2012-01-11· cited 26×
- Adams v. KasichSixth Circuit· 2012-01-13· cited 15×
Other cases named Robert Charles Towery v Janice K Brewer
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.