In Re Nash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in review of reinstatement proceeding, that United States Supreme Court has held that state cannot exclude a person from the practice of law in a manner that contravenes due process
• reinstatement after disbarment is uncommon in the legal profession, and not even possible in some jurisdictions
• reinstatement after disbarment is uncommon in the legal profession, and not even possible in some jurisdictions
• federal criminal enticement statute “targets the sexual grooming of minors as well as the actual sexual exploitation of them”
• federal criminal enticement statute \targets the sexual grooming of minors as well as the actual sexual exploitation of them\
• “We are entitled to have a reasonable assurance that the misconduct which brought the petitioner before this court once before will not reoccur.” (quoting In re Koken, 214 Or. 357, 329 P.2d 894, 895 (1958))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Morris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-12-07· cited 92×
• In Re Jaffee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-06-16· cited 16×
• In Re the Reinstatement of Wiederholt
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2004-04-23· cited 10×
• In Re Griffith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 9×
• In Re a Disbarred Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Arrotta
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2004-08-25· cited 8×
• In Re Reinstatement of Gunter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-03-27· cited 4×
• In Re Reinstatement of Starr
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-07-21· cited 2×
• Morris, Daniel Ray
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-12-07

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NM
  Supreme Court· 1957-05-06· cited 1,276×
• Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.
  Supreme Court· 1961-04-24· cited 535×
• State v. Hansen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-29· cited 156×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-09-17· cited 43×
• Supove v. Densmoor Et Ux
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-01-11· cited 43×
• Application of Taylor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 29×
• In Re Rowell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-03· cited 28×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-04-15· cited 25×
• In Re Bernard Jolles
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-06-19· cited 18×
• In Re Pioneer Warehouse Corp.
  E.D. New York· 1979-06-21· cited 15×
• In re Gregg
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-12-31· cited 15×
• In Re Jaffee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 10×
• Willamette View Manor, Inc. v. Peet
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-12-18· cited 9×
• In Re Koken
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1958-09-03· cited 9×
• Application of Gimbel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-10· cited 7×
• In Re Gortmaker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-11-16· cited 6×
• Application of Bevans
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-12-21· cited 5×
• In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Nash
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-06-25· cited 1×