In Re Bernard Jolles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in original application proceeding, proof of reformation generally is made through testimony by those living and working with the applicant
• “Generally, proof [of good moral character] must be made through the appraisal of those with whom the petitioner has worked and lived and who are in a position to see how he makes choices calling for moral decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Application of Taylor
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-06-29· cited 29×
• In Re Rowell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-03· cited 28×
• In Re Jaffee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-06-16· cited 16×
• Application of Alpert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-09-06· cited 15×
• In Re Nash
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-05· cited 11×
• In Re Griffith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-04-04· cited 9×
• In Re Easton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-12-18· cited 7×
• Application of Gimbel
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-10· cited 7×
• Petition of Waters
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1968-12-12· cited 7×
• Application of Bevans
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-12-21· cited 5×
• Application of Easton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-05-06· cited 5×
• In Re Tobiga
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-05-10· cited 4×
• In Re Reinstatement of Starr
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-07-21· cited 2×
• In re Halttunen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-12-24· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• In re Crum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1922-03-07· cited 21×