Application of Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying ORS 9.220 as it existed before its amendment to its present form in Oregon Laws 1981, chapter 193, section 7
• considering circumstances surrounding bankruptcy “as these circumstances illustrate an applicant’s judgment in handling serious financial obligations”
• earlier crime of theft; applicant had stated in an underlying proceeding that he had forgotten to pay for a stolen item, but then stated during admissions process that he had intended to steal the item
• admission denied based on perjury, theft, bankruptcy to avoid debt, and lack of reformation, quoting In re Ruffalo, 390 US 544, 555, 88 S Ct 1222, 1228, 20 L Ed 2d 117, 125 (1968) (White, J., concurring)
• court denied admission into the bar to applicant who five years earlier had perjured himself to secure acquittal to a charge of theft and seven years earlier had discharged his student loans in bankruptcy with no extraordinary hardship that would ordinarily compel resort to bankruptcy
• court denied admission into the bar to applicant who five years earlier had perjured himself to secure acquittal to a charge of theft and seven years earlier had discharged his student loans in bankruptcy with no extraordinary hardship that would ordinarily compel resort to bankruptcy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).