In Re Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that it is insufficient for witnesses to say that a petitioner simply \has\ moral character because such statements do not provide evidence of reformation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Reinstatement of Wiederholt
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2001-06-15· cited 21×
• Milligan v. Board of Professional Responsibility
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2009-12-08· cited 12×
• Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Gerard Reilly
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-09-02· cited 5×
• In Re Reinstatement of Gunter
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-03-27· cited 4×
• In Re Reinstatement of Starr
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-07-21· cited 2×
• In re Koper
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-04-27· cited 1×
• In Re Reinstatement of McKee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-01-10
• Amended November 8, 2016 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Gerard Reilly
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-09-02

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Rowell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-03· cited 28×
• In Re Bernard Jolles
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1963-06-19· cited 18×
• In Re Jaffee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-06-16· cited 16×
• In Re Admission to the Oregon State Bar of Fine
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-04-29· cited 16×
• In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Griffith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-30· cited 16×
• In Re Nash
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-08-05· cited 11×
• In Re Koken
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1958-09-03· cited 9×
• In Re Gortmaker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-11-16· cited 6×
• In Re Graham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-07-23· cited 3×
• Circus Time, Inc. v. Grumman Credit Corp. (In re Circus Time, Inc.)
  D. Maine· 1980-06-27· cited 3×