Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/1/2013

In re M.R.

Citations

  • 2013 Ohio 1302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court’s obligation was satisfied “albeit to the minimum extent possible” when the trial court cited to the appropriate statute and - 42 - Case Nos 9-15-37, 38, 39 there was clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings
  • “Moreover, * * * there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that it is in M.R.’s best interest to grant the Agency’s motion for permanent custody.”
  • “Moreover, * * * there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that it is in M.R.’s best interest to grant the Agency’s motion for permanent custody.”
  • “Moreover, * * * there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that it is in M.R.’s best interest to grant the Agency’s motion for permanent custody.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.