In re M.R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s obligation was satisfied “albeit to the minimum extent possible” when the trial court cited to the appropriate statute and - 42 - Case Nos 9-15-37, 38, 39 there was clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s findings
• “Moreover, * * * there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that it is in M.R.’s best interest to grant the Agency’s motion for permanent custody.”
• “Moreover, * * * there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that it is in M.R.’s best interest to grant the Agency’s motion for permanent custody.”
• “Moreover, * * * there is clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that it is in M.R.’s best interest to grant the Agency’s motion for permanent custody.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).